caryattwell: (Default)
In which I back up the wild claims Emory and Nate make in TOG. With science! And some other stuff.

1. Where the popcorn comes into play is that the properties of its questionable flavoring in some of the microwaveable varieties may actually have a hand in causing dementia. -- Chapter One

Afraid some enthusiastic microwaveable popcorn lobbyist might read my book and accuse me of besmirching popcorn's good name, I did consider taking this part out -- or at least sprinkling the word allegedly throughout the sentence with a liberal hand, but I really like little bits of throwaway trivia. And at the time of writing, I had just learned about it so I was itching to share (and ruin everyone's quintessential film-watching experiences, naturally. You're welcome.)

To be fair, eating butter-flavored popcorn probably isn't going to give you dementia. The study referenced regards food industry workers' chronic exposure to the flavoring ingredient, diacetyl, during the manufacturing process. Researchers found that the ingredient increased the risk of toxic damage to brain cells similar to the way proteins clump together in Alzheimer's disease. Which is still not to say that diacetyl definitely does link to dementia, but that it's a possibility.

Source: Science Daily

2. "Maybe," I said smoothly. "But Aristotle once said that people with curly hair can't be trusted, so..." -- Chapter Two

I first heard about this on QI, a wonderfully funny and informative British comedy panel quiz show, on their Fingers and Fumbs episode (S6E7). Apparently Aristotle was super into physiognomy, which reads a person's character or personality from facial features. He wrote a whole book on it, The Secrets of Nature Relating to Physiognomy, in which pretty much every facial feature signifies something horrible. Of the curly-haired: "He is by nature proud and bold, dull of apprehension, soon angry, and a lover of venery, and given to lying, malicious and ready to do any mischief."

So my characterization of Emory? Nailed it.

Source: Project Gutenberg

3. "Hi, Mithter J," said Abby, smiling the untroubled smile of five-year-olds everywhere. -- Chapter Five

This one isn't really a wild claim by either Emory or Nate; I just wanted to talk about it. Abby has a frontal lisp here, doing a 'th' for an 's'. Though this has no relevant impact on the storyline at all, in my mind she actually has a lateral lisp. However, dialogue with a lateral lisp is very difficult to spell. I'll let this lovely little girl from Horrible Histories demonstrate what that sounds like:



Incidentally, Horrible Histories is a brilliant, award-winning historical sketch show for children, and everyone should watch it.

The difference between frontal and lateral lisps, other than, obviously, tongue placement, is that the former is a typical developmental error that could potentially resolve on its own with maturity, while the latter is not a typical developmental error and almost always requires speech therapy, regardless of age.

Source: My school learnin's. (If you really want, I'm sure I can scare up some actual references for you.)

4. "No one can resist the face of a Lhasa Apso; it's been scientifically proven." -- Nate, Chapter Seven

Okay, this one Nate pulled right out of his shapely bum. But I mean, come on. Have you seen a Lhasa Apso? They're adorable.

caryattwell: (Default)
I've always felt bad for The Other Guy in romantic comedies. I'm not talking about your asshole Glenn Guglia types, who totally deserve a nice clout round the ear (or an airline beverage cart shoved into their elbow), but the ones who are perfectly reasonable, genial fellows with a single, defining flaw ("flaw") that automatically disqualifies them from being The One. See: Bill Pullman -- allergies; Greg Kinnear -- obsessed with typewriters; Kevin McKidd -- inability to share cake; Patrick Dempsey -- not from a Confederate state.

(I have watched a lot of romcoms in my life. I apologize for nothing.)

It was while watching said Dempsey wear the shoe on the other foot and McKidd hoard chocolate cake that it really struck me, though -- poor other guy. We're supposed to be stoked about Girl and Boy getting together at last but, man, what a bummer for the guy left behind. He hasn't done anything wrong, he loves the girl just as much and is even respectful enough to let her go with best wishes on his lips, but how in the world does he go on? Who helps him pick up the pieces?

I suppose, because he's such a decent human being, we can relax knowing that he'll someday find happiness too, but that doesn't make his heartbreak any less real. And just because the camera cuts away forever from him to the leads being deliriously happy with each other doesn't mean that's the end of his side of the story.

So I decided to write the rest of it, and that's how The Other Guy was born. :)

Profile

caryattwell: (Default)
caryattwell

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13 141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 08:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios